Let us have a look at some recent
discussions regarding global policies. From The
Greenwich Times [1], author David J. Lynch from The
Washington Post stated,
"Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the financial
reckoning imposed on Moscow in response are proof that the
triumphant globalization campaign that began more than 30
years ago has reached a dead end."
and also,
"......It's the end of one era and the beginning
of another, which is a less complete form of globalization
than we had ambitions for in the immediate post-Cold War era,"
said Michael Smart, managing director of Rock Creek Global
Advisors. "We have to think differently about what we mean by
the global trading system. There are certain requirements
that, if you don't meet them, you're not part of it. You can't
be in the club."
Lynch's view proffers the idea that a new,
malignant economic fault line has developed between prior Cold
War divisions. This is also arguably consistent with the
concept that rising business relationships between the First
World powers and the former Communist Bloc have been a major
factor in the prevention of war. Accumulation of
economic pressures on the Soviet economy led to its breakup,
but there was accommodation of Russia into global commerce
that stabilised the new situation, both from the Kremlin's
standpoint and the powerful businesses in Russia that quietly
influence it. During the 1983 Able Archer NATO nuclear
scenario drills, a truly incredible level of misunderstanding
between Russia and the West became evident. Differences
between the intelligence agencies, and more importantly,
between the mentalities of the leadership, resurrected the
chronic issue that Russia has never been considered an equal
partner. Nuclear weapons development changed this
reality, but not the attitude nor the West's abandonment of
self restraint. Reagan's sojourn with Gorbachev heralded
a new attitude, but behind the curtain the ultimate plans were
not at all consistent with appearances - the the point that
Reagan became disillusioned and objected. He then took
his bullet. It is reasonable to say that Putin's
decisions cannot be made in a vacuum any more than the
American President, and it is ultimately commerce, closely
related to all meaningful definitions of national security,
that are the foundations of peace not based upon subjugation -
either economic extortion or war. Relating to
Lynch's comments, we can see a parallel in recent Western
policy toward Russia - a paroxysm of generalised political
autocracy, and a New Order of unconscionable medical precepts,
applied to the covid/vaccine meme. And if I may state
once again - 'the handling of the covid situation has far
exceeded any definition of incompetence.'
Per Armstrong this morning [2],
"......Despite Blinken’s absurd statement that he
thinks Ukraine can defeat Russia without any sense of such
repercussions, this statement appears to be using Ukrainians
as pawns in an intended war against Russia that will only
bring in China and the rest of their alliance. Belarus is
already looking to add back nuclear weapons because proposing
Ukraine joins NATO is tearing up the Budapest Agreement
putting in jeopardy their security. Ukraine cannot defeat
Russia – let’s make this very clear and Blinken’s statement
appears to be a provocation for war. This is a losing battle
that will turn nuclear if Russia were really to lose. It
appears that this may be more about Climate Change and the
agenda from the WEF that to conquer the world with Schwab’s
economic theories, there were three obstacles – (1) Trump, (2)
Russia, and (3) China. Trump was removed and some fear this is
an attempt to overthrow Putin and then they will turn on
China."
Armstrong once again [3],
".....The West is committing financial suicide.
This spills over into corporations making long-term decisions
based upon the demonization of Putin, ignoring even the fact
that Kamala Harris publically told Ukraine to join NATO and
violated the neutrality of Ukraine agreed to in the 1991
Budapest Agreement. We are witnessing the decline and fall of
the world economy as we have known it. Those who have hated
the dollar, always calling for its crash, will see a future
where even cryptocurrencies will not survive. The false belief
that somehow crypto will bypass the central banks and end fiat
is such a joke. Ukraine’s power plant, the largest nuclear
plant in all of Europe, has been captured and is on fire.
Crypto is worthless without a power grid."
It also bears repeating what I recently
stated on Feb 25th,
'......The principal enemy of the people, East
and West, is not Putin, but the complex of oligarchs who
want the Great Reset and have committed institutional
genocide, and to borrow the term, "mentacide," within their
own countries. Just as the Great Reset meme is a
colossal failure, so is the result of any economic sanction
under its flag. The situation is extremely
dangerous.
And on Feb 27th,
'........ An interesting comment in
Greg Hunter's column on the Ukraine situation [4] includes a
reference to a lecture by John J. Mearsheimer [5], in which
the point is made that Ukraine has been caught between
Western and Russian agendas, in particular that the West
mislead Ukraine into a false sense of support that in turn
hardened Ukraine's resolve to defy Putin. Meanwhile,
NATO has consistently pressured Putin into a defensive
position, refusing meaningful negotiation. The West
has been driving Putin into a choice between submission to
Western economic objectives or else military action in
Ukraine. This is not related to the difference in
socioeconomic philosophies between East and West, but is
more a culmination of the economic war that forced
dissolution of the Soviet Union, and then translated into
the more recent objectives of the Great Reset global
paradigm. That paradigm is not only forcing its will
on Russia and China, but has become the primary adversary of
Western democracy through the covid meme. The
vaccination paradigm is a direct analogue of Western policy
regarding Ukraine, and both are doomed [6].'
And notably on Feb 12th,
'........It is self-evident that current
planetary socioeconomics is unsustainable in every
respect. Interestingly, an ostensibly identical meme
is stated in the halls in Geneva, echoed under specious
arguments of false environmentalism and reheated ideals of
socialism of Klaus Schwab's "Green Reset." It is for
this that the covid meme was engineered, to produce
population conformity to the more draconian social
engineering to come. No other meme or
hyper-extrapolation of medical incompetence can explain it,
except, in addition, as a treacherous application of Stanley
Milgram's paradigm [7], taken from A. Eichmann's work.
We can also look to G. Orwell for insight on this
phenomenon.'
The industrialists of the West are
performing a controlled demolition of the global economy,
attempting to reign in the old Cold War bloc. It is not
working, and neither is the concept that all can then be
"Built Back Better" under a "Great Green Reset." The
remedy has devolved to direct military conflict induced by
economic fait accompli, with consideration [Skousen] that even
this has been anticipated, and that a Sino-Russian preemptive
attack on America may be induced to subdue the most refractory
culprit - the human rights and decentralised independence
cherished by the American populace, or at least that great
portion which remains resolute to such principles. This
destructive meme is technocratic arrogance and self-delusion
at a level that is difficult to distinguish from the ambitions
of Adolf Hitler, and, in terms of the leaders and complicit
institutions, may demand a similar resolution, applied in
multiplicity. It is doubly ironic that Putin has
recently been painted with the little mustache by Western
press, which is perhaps the most inflammatory and ironic
insult one could possibly make to a Russian. But then
again, this sort of propaganda is clinically anticipated, and
will, as it is evidently intended, wake the dogs of war.
The half truth begins with the understanding that Putin is KGB
and not Albert Schweitzer, and that Russia will operate in its
own interests, and in accordance with the brutal norms of
historical conflicts in human affairs. Information that
Russia [and China] have established clandestine military
assets and military-industrial espionage in the West, in
particular the U.S., is consistent with that reality, as well
as the now fully vetted view that they are not considered
partners in the planetary decision-making in Geneva and
elsewhere. It is also unsavory to consider that it is
our own politicians who have betrayed us in the most egregious
way, dealing with these foreign interests for their personal
profit, and directly compromising the interests of the
American people. This meets the definition of
enemy-domestic, in fact, more precisely.... treason.... and it
is also ironic that these same political operatives, pandering
to our childish compulsions as so-called leaders, have
engineered edicts, agencies and policies to label those who
object to these developments as the domestic threats. Then
again, we only have to turn to the likes of Justin Trudeau, a
vetted globalist, to see evidence of the generality of the
problem -and the real threat to the peoples - in North
America. The entire covid/vaccine meme is a carefully planned
entree for the controlled economic demolition necessary to
establish the New Order. Notably, Armstrong's code
results for political chaos in 2022-23 are not to be taken
lightly, nor his many publications indicating severe
consequences of our current course.
A common vehicle of social
engineering wordcrafting that artificially and powerfully
produces the effect of censure is the term "conspiracy
theory/theorist." We have, however, now entered an era
in which absolute insolvency of generalised policies
paralleled in global strategic and medical memes has become so
flagrant and unambiguous that the only remaining criterion is
the distinction between hyperbolic incompetence and a level of
fulminate extortion of every sovereign and major institution,
and that therefore meets the true, pluperfect definition of
conspiracy. One must ask at this point whether epidemic
of incompetence, contagious subconscious complicity with
compromised ethics, and Mesmeric redemptions that produce mass
genocide, are expressions of the same root phenomenon.
Either way, the situation is unacceptable in
terms of common sense and the long established morays of human
conduct.... as is the current state of virtually every
government and sanctioned institution on this planet.
The remedy would therefore suggest divine intervention, but
then again we would be faced with the ambiguities of two
distinct forms of redemption before a confused, desperate
people, to decide which is in the demeanor of a
Christ-consciousness as opposed to its
anti-consciousness. And these days, it is hard to hear
the small, still voice behind the the thunder of
institutionalized duplicities.
Behind all of this Machiavellian
work is the nagging consideration that the arrogance of this
Brave New World, whose preeminent religion is becoming
existential materialism, is, in terms of spirit and
consciousness, a definitively a closed set, and therefore by
definition, dead. Those who, behind their marble
columns, believe themselves the saviors of the world, are
simply an explosive sequel of world-consuming megalomaniacs,
whose memes are fatal - another irony. Their policies,
in particular the asinine institutionalised consensus of
superficial environmental obfuscations, and their highly
classified analogues in weaponized programmes - with dire
consequences of accumulating failures - underlie all
justifications and specious equivocations for the current
geopolitical jibes. They are also, by definition and
common precedent, suicidal. How then, are the peoples
of this world to break such patterns among this litany of
false kings? Something truly new must soon arise from
within the heart of man, a psychic chain reaction to supersede
the neutron chain reaction, else we will never know the
distinction between fate and destiny.
--------------------------------REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
https://twitter.com/ThePr0diga1S0n/status/1485729483151880194?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1485729483151880194%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.infowars.com%2F%3Fcp%3D1
[6]
The best analytical evidence of this perspective
are the consistent results from Martin Armstrong's SOCRATES
socioeconomic code, indicating a shift of global power from
the West to China and its partners, in the timeframe of 2032.