Hi Greg -
Glad to see that you got Dane on
the show. His research is key to
understanding the fundamental strategy of
global agenda. I should offer now a
more detailed discussion, should you find
it helpful -
It has been three and a half years
since I came to the conclusion that the
nuclear winter effect [see, for instance,
"On The 8th Day"] will soon become
necessary to intervene, once certain
points of no return are reached in
planetary thermal feedback cycles, and I
mentioned the matter to Dane at that
time. This had not been mentioned
anywhere that I knew of, although,
interestingly, recently it has emerged in
an article or two. That is perhaps
ominous, as it means that the concept may
be under actual consideration, of course
confidentially, at high levels after
all. In particular, the
methane issue, per the Kennett Study [see
Clathrate Gun Hypothesis], forms the most
lethal basis for concern. Dane has been
discussing this danger for some years now,
and I recall his points in the 2013
timeframe in which satellite showed a
gigantic increase in methane out gassing
near the north pole. In December of
2018 I wrote Dane regarding the concern
that the global agenda may include a
nuclear winter scenario for those reasons,
and he has mentioned the concept on a
number of occasions since then.
I also pointed out that Joel
Skousen's discussions in Strategic
Relocation [see 3rd ed., 2010] regarding
U.S. nuclear policy and the general
geopolitical plan included a limited
nuclear war - an attack induced from
Russia and China in order to introduce the
necessary impetus for a U.N. intervention
and final disposition of American cultural
independence from the New Order
agenda. Skousen further pointed out
that the process began formally in 1997
with the signing of PDD-60 by Clinton,
limiting U.S. strategic nuclear response
in the event of a tactical strike - the
U.S. would absorb the strike. In my
work in the Trident Missile guidance
component radiation testing arena, I
remember in the 1990's the discussions of
conversion of some of the Trident missiles
to conventional warheads, which seemed
ridiculous, considering their cost.
Something has been compromising U.S.
nuclear capability under a strategy that
is far more complex than ordinary
defense. Something other than the
massive strategic MAD scenario has been in
play, and it is not simply the idealistic
nuclear disarmament concept. In this
context, however, the U.S. population is
nonetheless regarded as expendable - as
indeed it is in the larger global
agenda.
In the timeframe of Skousen's
2010 discussions it was difficult to
imagine that such a strategy could become
real, but as the failure of geoengineering
and deliberate forest burning clearly
became a losing battle in 2018, the
Skousen discussion took on a new
perspective. The climate issue
became a matter of producing a sharp rise
of particulate matter that could cause a
decisive shift in the ultimate equilibrium
point of the new planetary thermodynamic
state which would completely interrupt the
Clathrate Gun effect, or even be used to
mitigate the slower industrial
anthropogenic components. We are
notably already at 4 parts per million
methane in the atmosphere, and rising, and
as Dane often points out, methane is two
orders of magnitude larger in greenhouse
effect than carbon dioxide. It is
also worth noting his recent discussions
about the immense methane blowouts near
Antarctica, which are sequels to the
blowouts that have been occurring in the
Siberia methane deposits for some years
now. About forty million acres of
forest in Siberia burned last year - an
order of magnitude larger than in North
America, and comparable to the Amazon and
central Africa. This is arguably by
design, but is, even in addition to the
aerosol SRM, fighting a losing battle
against the planetary thermal runaway and
also is contributing to the destruction of
the ozone layer. Dane has also
pointed out the irony that the same
particulate matter that mitigates sunlight
also, and even more strongly, inhibits
infrared re-radiation at night - hence his
point that nighttime lows have been
generally rising even faster than day
highs across the
planet. One
possible remedy is the inducement of a
caldera eruption or series of volcanoes
that would produce a controlled nuclear
winter effect. I suspect, however,
that the outcome is too unpredictable and
also is especially prone to production of
enhanced fallout, as the neutron
activation of the volcanic material would
be massive, and then cast into the
air. The first underwater nuclear
bomb test was disastrous because of the
immense fallout from seawater. Most
do not realize as well that Russian
strategy includes the use of nuclear
torpedoes against our ports, which would
be severely disabled from the enhanced
fallout. As it turns out, we have
the 1970's vintage calculations of nuclear
winter effect that indicate that a very
small percentage of our arsenals would
induce the phenomenon - something on the
order of the number of warheads already
tested worldwide. The nuclear
fallout from a campaign intended to use
the explosives as incendiaries to produce
surface burning [and production of the
proper amount of particulate matter] is
survivable, especially when combined with
a plan to go underground for a period of
time. I suspect that the elite
underground facilities may have exactly
this scenario in mind, and of course, not
giving consideration to the vast majority
of humanity who have not been so
prepared. The philosophy of such an
operation is that the methane clathrate
catastrophe [and now, arguably the
ultraviolet sterilization effect] indicate
a potential for total planetary extinction
of life, while the nuclear winter effect,
especially if limited, may simply destroy
most life, with the prospect of
regeneration. It is indeed an
equation of lesser of two evils. But
it is also an equation of technocratic
arrogance used by those whose theology is
existential materialism.
Despite the logic, I do not,
of course, endorse the concept.
Dane's philosophy is that we would be
better off shutting down geoengineering
altogether, and face the music. This
would, naturally, also mean the end of
weather warfare, and of course, the music
- a massive destabilization of climate as
the planet would fight to return to a new
equilibrium point [some degree of change
is already permanent]. There appears
to be no way to avoid massive famine at
this point. There are other reasons
not to induce the nuclear winter effect,
including the uncertainties of the
conflict under which the process would be
cloaked, the stupidity of war itself, and
also the contamination associated with
both the weapons and total societal
breakdown, including the loss of control
of the nuclear power reactor
facilities. There is concern that
under a general grid failure, nuclear
stations would not be able to execute
reactor refueling outages to place the
fuel from ALL of the reactors into the
spent fuel pools before diesel reserves
would run out in such circumstances.
Operating reactors could be used [if, for
instance, EMP did not trip them in the
first place], but even in optimal
conditions, reactor trips are common, and
even so, the last reactor would have to be
offloaded with no offsite power
available. Never mind for the
moment, that under such conditions,
personnel would become short and the many
other support personnel who attend outages
will not be there to deal with routine
problems. And..... who will be
delivering more diesel, and where will it
be found, in such a situation? I do
not know if this level of scenario has
been addressed at the NRC or FEMA, but
judging how well nuclear disasters have
been handled in the past [or, for that
matter, Katrina, etc, etc], I am not
comfortable with the prospect - this
should be discussed in public forum,
instead of juvenile spats happening at the
Oscars, and the gauntlet of gender
identity crises and psy-op race conflicts
of people who have no Connexxion with
reality.
All of the talk about Maunder
Minima and ice age discussions are, in my
view, half truths - they are valid
effects, but on a much longer timescale
than the planetary thermodynamics caused
by the current combination of industrial
waste and geo-engineering. In point
of fact, the geo-engineering more
resembles the efficacy of painkillers -
the more they are used, the more they are
needed, with that day soon coming for
massive withdrawal.
These considerations are
where our thinking should be directed,
along with the greater social and
spiritual equations related to mankind's
greater purpose and life itself.
Those who have held power over this planet
up to this time should be promptly
dispensed with, and new roots should
sprout where the dead crowns have
fallen.
All the Best,
Steve O'Neal
I noticed
that Greg Hunter has done an interview
with Dane Wigington [1]. This is
important in my view, as I have
pointed out repeatedly that the
ultimate basis of the global "reset"
concept and the conflict manufactured
over Ukraine is the imminent loss of
ecological solvency, citing in
particular Dane's data. The
military-sanction agenda is an
obfuscation for global financial
collapse, and the financial collapse
is an obfuscation of the ecological
basis, combined with the inherent
failure of the Keynesian economic
philosophy that terminates in
unrecoverable sovereign debt.
To what
extent Klaus Schwab and numerous heads
of state are actually aware of the
fuller argument I do not know, since
even he [and they] are being played by
a more occult boardroom, whose
philosophies are foreign to
conventional human ethos. And,
to what portion these agenda may
involve clandestine cooperation with
an extraterrestrial terra-forming
program, or simply be a result of
ecological infarction from industrial
pollution and a suite of extinction
level events resulting from
weaponization of weather, is not
immediately resolvable.
What is
clear........ is that there is a
permanent shift in the thermodynamic
locus of the strange attractor that
governs heat and moisture balance of
the planet, and that the net effect is
an unprecedented extinction
phenomenon, and a huge reduction in
carrying capacity that translates to
imminent famine, among other
consequences. Severe drought is
headed to the North American wheat
belt this summer, which is certainly
not helpful given the current global
picture, nor accidental. It is
also notable to discover that Dane's
radiometer readings are showing
continued hardening of the ultraviolet
spectrum, to now include x-rays.
The prognosis for all outdoor crops
becoming disastrously reduced by this
spectral hardening is now just several
years from its terminal point, and the
effects on all animal and plant life
are very much already in play.
Monsanto, et al, have been engineering
plants to resist aluminum
contamination [from SRM aerosols], but
I do not believe that any work has
been done, or perhaps can reasonably
be done, to effectively resist UVC and
X-rays. The matter will become
moot anyway, as the entire planetary
ecosystem is highly interconnected,
and general loss of systemic symbiosis
is failing as we speak. That we
have lost in just four decades, among
many others, over two thirds of the
planet's plankton is seldom addressed,
but represents an extinction level
event in its own right, again - among
numerous others. The coliseum is
running overtime as the real threats
to not only our interests, but our
existence, are being drowned out by
the clatter of chariots, trendy
consciousness ascension psychobabble,
and misplaced patriotic bluster to
make new cannon fodder. It is
increasingly difficult to ignore even
Nostradamus' quatrains regarding a
third world conflict, including rather
specific references to nuclear
explosives and to unprecedented
drought and famine, and -
"....the
price of a bushel of wheat shall rise
so high that man will become a
man-eater."
It seems a
good time to put Dane on the show
again, as it has been five years since
we first introduced him, and the
warnings then are now hatching.
As I work desperately behind schedule
alone at the homestead, knowing all of
this, and knowing that so very few
even care, let alone understand what
is coming, it is disheartening to see
my own technical talents lost in the
dirt on a remote hill. Meanwhile
the Musk's and Bezos' of the world,
instead of investing in bona fide
humanity, build conspicuous wealth and
space ships to play in near earth
orbit, punching even more holes in the
atmosphere and ozone, as if it were an
escape, as the peoples of our world
suffer under a monotonous, rancid Old
Order of Pharaohs and slaves, always
calling itself the New, and which so
clearly needs to be overthrown.
It could also be said that, once truth
has delivered its sentence, the last
man on earth will be the wisest, but
then again, who, in their right mind,
wants to be that wise?
[1]