Stephen O'Neal Commentaries, 01 through 31 May, 2022





27 May, 2022

The Ironic Dichotomies


Note this discussion regarding Soros and Zelensky's Ukraine [1].  Armstrong has many staff around the world,, including sources inside Ukraine, revealing the side of the conflict that is being suppressed by Western press and governments.  In particular, note the following extract -

".....I have been sent videos taken from Ukrainian soldiers showing the torture they are submitting to Russians. I have refrained from posting them because they are so horrible. There are Russians being nailed to a cross and then set on fire alive. There are two soldiers who volunteered. One from Canada and one from France. Both have returned disgusted telling about the war crimes they have watched the Ukrainians carrying out. Nobody wants to even admit that there are Ukrainian neo-Nazis."

While Americans are being drowned in controlled media propaganda cheerleading an open ended war agenda, many are convinced that the Zelensky regime is the victim of Russian imperialism.  But we see a picture emerging from the inside that more resembles Hitler's rationalizations about Poland and Czechoslovakia.  Our so-called leaders make no mention of the Minsk agreement or Kissinger's analysis, and now appeal in Davos. 

There remains, however, a watershed issue regarding the real nature of climate instability.  Unfortunately, for the development of these considerations, I am not  in the circles of the world players, and therefore cannot command Armstrong's attention regarding Wigington's substantial findings on climate collapse.  Or perhaps he is aware, but disregards them for a profound reason that we all need to know.  Armstrong continues, prima facie, to place all climate change in the category of the faux climate change socioeconomic meme.  Unless these issues are given proper audience at the global player level where Armstrong has great influence, all will be a horse race between whether the false environmentalism will devastate us from war, or the real ecological collapse parameters will put an end to life as we know it, or perhaps all life period - and in a matter of just a few years.  The Biden parroting of environmental issues [2] is just the carbon credit propaganda that Armstrong talks about, taken from the same playbook that is sending us headlong into world war three.  Until we develop as a population the discernment between the false issues from the real ones, we are nothing more than fated livestock in a depopulation agenda that will, one way or another, succeed under the current state of affairs and suppressed awareness.  I am still frankly stunned that Armstrong, despite his refractory independence and global reach, is apparently completely in absentia regarding Wigington's investigations and observations, and that the alternative media and its technical sources remain largely a collection of pulpits, being pounded as an uncoordinated clatter of objections.  To lump these investigations with the faux environmentalism is, in my view, a huge mistake, but there is not yet even a direct reference at these levels of conference upon which to base discourse at this point.  Meanwhile, the oceans are mostly already dead, the insects are nearly so as well, bird populations are falling precipitously, and forests are becoming incredibly sickened, as we find large concentrations of aluminum and barium and strontium in our soil and watersheds - all sprayed into our atmosphere in a vain attempt to control climate and wage war.  This must be urgently addressed, and not as a peripheral or marginalized issue.

---------------
[1]
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/ukraine/soros-promoting-world-war-iii-lets-go/

[2]
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/energy/the-incredible-transition/



26 May, 2022


Urgent Considerations for Our Future    


This morning's three articles from Armstrong are worth noting and expanding upon [1]. [2], [3].   Article [1] states directly the importance of "...a return to the status quo ante" concept offered by Kissinger to resolve the Ukraine-Russia situation, a path to ending the immediate global food logistic problems, and the path to world war.  Also, to lift the quote from the article,
“We are sure that everything will be fine, and we are sure that we will win, we will achieve all the goals,” spokesman Dmitry Peskov said. Russia has already downgraded “unfriendly states” to “hostile states” as Western countries are now directly involved. “

it is clear that Russia intends to maintain full commitment to its original intentions in Ukraine.  Kissinger has made it clear that Russia DOES have legitimate claims regarding its security in this matter, that supersede arguments regarding more recent definitions of Ukrainian domain, and the relative obtuseness of the invasion.  It is still well arguable that the Kremlin wold have not invaded if not for the flagrant litany of equally obtuse provocations on the NATO side of matters.  Clearly, Kissinger is pointing out that the Russian point of view has, for quite some time, been totally disregarded.  This same situation led, in all practical terms, to Khrushchev's decision to project power in Cuba in order to balance the effect of missiles in Turkey, and in particular, to answer the West's systematic emasculation of the Soviet role in the world.  The excessive paranoia of Russia set up by R. Gehlen in his relationship with the OSS and CIA, are partly responsible, but the complex of Western corporate and national interests were arguably short-sighted by attempting to count Russia out of the world picture.  The same pattern exists today, and it will bring war, and a similar result to Hitler's foolishness.  The same issue is being applied to China, as it has also been resisting the Great Reset collusion process, and now, due to the incredible ineptness of Western leaders in their complicity with the agenda, Russia and China are finding reasons to cooperate on a deeper level - something Kissinger is also warning about.  It is interesting, if not nauseating, to see the digit-heads criticizing Kissinger's solutions, offering the same juvenile, pedantic rationales that they proffered against the real solutions to Covid.  Kissinger, at 99. does not have another several decades to offer well seasoned solutions.  And neither do we.

We see in [2], that an identical pattern is being set up in relation to the Taiwan-China issue, and once again Kissinger's approach is essentially non-interference.  Projection of American power has changed significantly, and we can turn again to Skousen's hypothesis regarding the artificial induction of a limited nuclear strike by Russia and China as part of a global shift in power [to a U.N.based system that eradicates the norm of independence of the American populace].  Use of PDD-60

and other indications of restraint of strategic nuclear response are consistent with this seemingly obtuse hypothesis, but the consideration that the American populace is expendable in the new global structure is not at all difficult to see at this point. 

Article [3] is notable in this context as it highlights the degree of saturation of our political system with malignant political self-interest, to the degree that there is total loss of functional service of public interest by our government and its corporate cohorts.  This has traditionally been regarded as a definition for fascism, which, of course, the radical let pot has called the kettle black in regard to President Trump.  He, and anyone else who proposed to interfere with the status quo, will be drowned - until the entire political system has been taken to the river, under some kind of massive pretext and power of public realization.   

The same corruption of public interest, to include corruption of technological methods and sensible norms relating to morality, have consumed our society, to the extent that they resemble the rationalizations of the Third Reich.  This will, in particular, lead to a similar degree of self-destruction, as the ultimate global food issue is not even war logistics and sanctions, but explosive ecological collapse that is realistically on the order of just a few years now.  Even Kissinger's solutions are in essence only the sustaining of the previous global industrial order.  An entirely new approach is needed to not simply restore international cooperation, but to define a much higher conscience and awareness of our real situation, and its solutions.  A gigantic reality check is in order, but that may well become a third world war, and then its compounded consequences.  At this point in American public psychology, the mentality is so prostrated, and now plagued by a new round of "sociological events," that in terms of genuine global solutions, the  American public may end up not being simply expendable, but frankly disposable, along with the other major Western powers.  There is little doubt that such a view exists in Russia and China, and a good many other countries who have had their climates manipulated to the point that they are near ruin, or worse.  This will require far more than change in policy - it will require a great philosophical and spiritual revelation.  How that will be achieved is a dissertation by itself, but one has to wonder to what realistic avail at this point. The danger is that the traditional antichrist theme of redemption to lead out of an epic war will be the route of change.  We must now look deep into our souls for the question of whether our future will be defined by the passive cycles of fate, or by the efforts that produce destiny. 

-------------

[1]
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/uncategorized/ukrainian-solution-money-weapons-and-embargo/

[2]
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/war/henry-kissinger-on-taiwan/

[3]
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/politics/trump-where-do-i-get-my-reputation-back/

25 May, 2022

A further addendum

This could also be an addendum to the previous major discussion, as Armstrong's article covering Biden's direct statements regarding China and Taiwan [1] are so relevant and consistent with yesterday's assessment of our situation in the White House, the direction we are headed, and what is becoming arguably necessary to preserve our national interests.  These observations leave no further dissertation necessary to flesh out the utter recklessness, damage, and dangers ahead created by the current administration, all customary dimensions of domestic politics notwithstanding, that also arguably has been criminally installed to prostrate not only American interests under flimsy, specious environmental and sociological arguments, but to prostrate both Russia and China as well under the delusional Great Reset socialist agenda in Geneva.  It is not helpful that our President is not only verbally incontinent, but in general scarcely competent to hold the office, let alone to properly conduct war.  His V.P., a complicit token of incompetence already sent in early February to Davos to call the dogs of war, is hardly an improvement, leaving all conventional remedies in check-mate, for another long three years.    Even Kissinger has spoken recently in Davos, pointing out the organic solution to the Ukraine crisis, and which quite obviously the White House and Rear Annex are not only not giving consideration to, but, in point of fact, are impetuously hurdling into every opportunity to inflame world affairs to irrevocable conditions for major war, let alone total, malignant economic chaos.  Perhaps Capitol Hill is so completely consumed by its terminal Romanesque culture of superfluous, graft and extortion, while the city burns, to properly address the situation, but one has to wonder, despite whatever political veneer has been applied there, whether the halls of the Pentagon must surely be echoing the scenarios of some terrible realizations.          

----------------------------------------
[1]
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/war/an-unprovoked-biden-threatens-war-with-china/



24 May, 2022

The Solution


   Ordinarily yahoo news is radleft swill, but this morning's article [1] entitled "Henry Kissinger: Ukraine must give Russia territory," contains a valuable observation - Kissinger's recent statements at Davos regarding the Ukraine situation.   

Per Kissinger -

“....Negotiations need to begin in the next two months before it creates upheavals and tensions that will not be easily overcome. Ideally, the dividing line should be a return to the status quo ante. Pursuing the war beyond that point would not be about the freedom of Ukraine, but a new war against Russia itself,”

   As Armstrong has pointed out in historical terms, the Dnieper river has been the principal cultural boundary.  Khrushchev administratively assigned lands to the east to Kiev under Soviet rule, and when the post Soviet divisions occurred, this residual of instability was left in place.  When the eastern areas and Crimea subsequently attempted to be absorbed into Russia, the Kremlin declined, which was an  arguable mistake.  Kissinger did make the point in his FT interview that Putin's military action was both unexpected and made complicated by the invasion of a recognized sovereign country that had a number of international agreements in place, but the Davos comments refine a solution based on the concept that despite questions of the war's legitimacy in international terms, there exist overarching root rationales both in terms of Russian security unilaterally encroached upon by NATO in violation of the Belgrade agreement, and in terms of demographic and historical precedents.   

   What is particularly interesting is that although Kissinger is a key player in global affairs at high levels, and as John Coleman points out in "The 300", principal executor of global policy in the U.S., he is quite obviously not parroting the agenda to force regime change in the Kremlin and recklessly prostrate Russia in behalf of the Great Reset agenda, at least in any direct terms.  This mal-occlusion in the halls of global policy indicates a critical weakness in Geneva that be exploited, and represents a key opportunity to establish hope for some degree of sensibility in world affairs.  If the White House does not appeal to this opportunity and competent logic proffered by Kissinger, then impeachment of both Biden and Harris, based upon their direct roles in recklessly creating and aggravating this war and its massive consequences, should be initiated.  If it is not possible to shake Washington down, then division of the country on the basis of preserving the sensibility and solvency of its constitutional basis should be actively considered. 

   There are also, in the context of the energy situation, complex issues to be addressed, as we note Armstrong's articles this morning [2], [3].  The remaining problem is how to reconcile a transition from unsustainable fossil fuel economy to a sustainable one, but without bringing the world to war and even worse ecological effects by drastic and counterproductive moves ultimately related to the disaster capitalism of the false environmentalism meme.   The very process of waging war using weather manipulation exceeds the damage of fossil fuel emissions, and is exacerbated by ivory tower sycophantic solipsism that routinely translates into not only unrealistic, but dangerous policies uncognizant of the true complexity of the natural order.    
 
  We note in Kissinger's choice of words, the implication that we are near a point of no return in international affairs, and the consequences of pushing Russia against the wall, with legitimate insults to its security not only unilaterally violated, but now confirmed in spades, and under a shadow of juvenile and unfathomable accessory among Western heads of state.  The current situation is as unstable as it is reckless, and calls for a precipitous reconsideration of all governments and institutions in their roles of so-called stewards of the peoples' interests.  A new type of leader must emerge, who can initiate a psychic chain reaction suitable for an enlightened civilization, or else prepare for the observation made during the military inventiveness of the American civil war - that machines will evolve to the point that we will end up blowing up the world.  This process is, however, hazardous, as it is prone to false redemptions as in the first two of Nostradamus' antichrists, both also notably in Europe.  One must ask the question of what critical leap in human consciousness might be achieved to make the transition from the black magic of the past to its enlightened complement.  Of course, there are our prophets, but they routinely end up far less availed than the silk tongues of our false redeemers.  Somehow this must change, or in a few moments, nature itself will unceremoniously mete justice under natural law, which we cannot corrupt and imprison.          

----------------------------------
[1]
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/henry-kissinger-warns-against-defeat-174812366.html

[2]
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/politics/whos-to-blame-for-rising-gas-prices/


[3]
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/energy/biden-administration-deliberately-destroy-our-capacity-to-produce-energy/


May 22/23,  2022

Global Events and Policy  (Addendum follows)



    Following the recent interview of P.C. Roberts [1], several revealing interviews are worth considering, including a FT interview of Henry Kissinger, Greg Hunter's update with Dr. Charles Nenner [3], and Martin Armstrong's discussion of the disease cycle [4]. 

   The Roberts interview on May 3rd, covered on a previous discussion posted on May 5th, offers the point that Western policy, and notably the White House, has presented an acerbic and intransigent posture toward Russia that predates the invasion, and is attended by a persistent absence of any appeal to avenues of discourse and peace.  The logical proposition to reconcile such an obtuse condition has been to regard such a posture is patently deliberate, with the ultimate intention to prostrate Russia, and eventually China, as part of a move to sub duct these two principal centers of resistance to the new Global Reset Agenda.  In early February I pointed out that there were concerns that Putin might be "duped" into a military action similar to the pretext operated through Kuwait to induce Hussein to take action against the lateral drilling under his oil fields adjoining Kuwait, thereby generating the larger pretext for the U.S. military action against Iraq.  The details that Hussein was an operative for U.S. regional operations, handed weaponized anthrax by Don Rumsfeld, and then lied to by both the CIA and the State Department regarding our supposed indifference if he were to invade Kuwait, are highly consistent with many foreign operations, and certainly are business as usual for the CIA.  It is not an improbable consideration to assign a similar psychological operation to our relationship with the Kremlin of late, or to even suppose that hubris and tradition are in full bloom under the belief that the same line of policies and coordinated covert operations can actually take down the Kremlin in the form of a regime change, and that the change will be compliant with Western interests.  It is interesting that Kissinger directly states that given the current posture of Western policy towards the Kremlin, the only logical prognosis is to induce regime change under duress.  Armstrong has pointed out that behind Putin are hard liners who will likely take a more draconian path.  Surely our intelligence analysts and policy makers are aware of this - which then begs the question - is this all deliberate, never mind reckless, if not for an extraordinary occult purpose, or else unprecedented, contagious insanity on the part of the entire entourage of Western heads of state?  None of this indicates a benign outcome.    

   The Financial Times' interview with Henry Kissinger [1] reveals a dissonance between current U.S. - Western global policy and certain long range views of Kissinger, with serious uncertainties regarding the path of the war and international relationships.  A number of considerations stand out from Kissinger's statements, including the clear indication that he disagrees with the current policy of creating a condition in which Russia and China may be brought into practical alliance, polarizing the world, and under the shadow of rising tensions.  Less obvious, but most dangerous, is the uncertainty about Russian "Red Line point," after which the decision must be made to either submit to Western pressures, or else appeal to nuclear and other major options.  Kissinger met Putin on a number of occasions in prior years as part of an education process for world affairs, and in particular, notes that Putin, who evidently has a long range, "mystical" view of Russia and its role in the world, became offended and strategically concerned when the NATO line of demarcation moved eastward from the Elbe.  Noting in this context  the recent considerations in the literature indicating that the Russian military operation has NOT included the widespread smashing of electrical, water and major infrastructure, the hypothesis that the Kremlin, and in particular Putin, are performing a limited political operation to limit Ukraine's strategic posture, acting sincerely in national interest against a complex encroachment by the West, is as credible as the Western intransigence is unfathomable.  To orchestrate an alternative picture will require extraordinary revelations, well in excess of any arguments for Russian imperialism.

   Kissinger said that he feels that Putin's move was a mistake and an underestimate of both the comprehensiveness of the Western response and the scale of cost to Russian resources.  Even to Kissinger, the Kremlin remains opaque, although understandably so.  Something evidently pressed urgency.  It is arguable, for instance, that Harris' statement in Brussels two weeks before the invasion that Ukraine should join NATO was a last straw to provoke Putin, and consistent with the intent to generate the war.  As discussed in prior considerations, a move by the Kennedy administration to erode Khrushchev's standing in the Kremlin by announcing the truth about the missile gap was effective because it was performed by the assistant Secretary of Defense, in an obscure speech in the Midwest - a source high enough to be taken seriously as the KGB would carry the information quietly to the Kremlin, but not so high as to be directly provocative as an international statement during the Missile Crisis.  Current Western policy is entirely devoid of such delicacies, with every action more resembling the economic sanctions and rhetoric driving of Japan to a war footing with the U.S. prior to Pearl Harbor.  The potential for accidental nuclear war is unnervingly high for such reasons, and that includes a false flag component as well.    

    Coiled up behind the international arguments is the realization from Kissinger's talk that he is evidently NOT advising the White House, or at least is not being listened to.  As Kissinger is the senior ranking operative through the CFR, the question arises of whether global policy, and the U.S. role are being dictated at an even higher level, and that the danger of nuclear war has taken a back seat to a more serious and occult agenda.  Even Nenner's war cycle indicates the loss of a third of the global population during this war.  If one folds in ecological infarction not anticipated by the models, the fraction could go much higher.  For Western policy to take on the demeanor of a grade school playground, and the world economy to be wrecked with incredible precision, and that following the Covid ordeal with drought and crop failure rising, takes on a new level of horror under the realization that even Kissinger is in disagreement with our high level policy, that has evidently gone rogue or been usurped.  

      The Covid and vaccination agenda continue to be relevant, although there is disagreement regarding its future course.  Nenner [3] states that the pandemic cycle is over, but Armstrong's code results indicate a peak this year [4].  One point that Armstrong makes is that the covid rise in 2020 was not the actual advent but rather a precursor to the vaccine event, which is now underway.  The traditional historical pandemic cycles referenced by Nenner evidently differ from the socioeconomic event of the vaccine agenda.  Such technical distinctions may be relevant in other cycles, in particular climate.  Nenner, as well as Armstrong, both subscribe to the traditional long cycles that indicate a cooling trend for planetary climate, and discard the fanfare about "climate change" as economic manipulations.  The principal alternative to the public global warming meme resides in the cooling planet hypothesis, based largely upon modulations of solar cycles and their secondary effects. I propose, however, that while the  cooling trend is valid, it is on a timescale much longer than the present dilemmas related to greenhouse feedback generated by the combination of industrial emissions and weaponized climate operations.  This has been addressed a number of times in previous discussions, but the shifting of timing and even direction of the cycle behavior due to forced transients on short time scales may now be especially critical in our perspective.  When wave functions encounter a boundary condition, they become exponentials.such as the wave function of an electron in a potential well, as one notes the nonzero probability density outside the well related to either quantum tunneling or else a perturbation that sends the electron outside the boundary.  In the many second order differential equations that describe physical systems, bifurcations can occur as certain system parameters are shifted to a sufficient degree that a sudden and permanent change in state occurs.  Fractals are notorious examples of such events.  The concern is that the global data being collected by Wigington is not only essentially correct, but that despite any long wave planetary trends,

This may be an explanation for the obtuse nature of international affairs, and behind a closely guarded agenda that renders traditional matters of state obsolete.  It is also an explanation for the possibility that a nuclear winter effect is ultimately being designed into international affairs, as a calculation to save a portion of life on the planet, as an alternative to total commitment to the Venus effect.  More development of these considerations is clearly called for, in particular, in relation to the possibility that all may be a miscalculation after all. 

   Clearly, we need a different way to run a planet, although solutions are another discussion.  For certain, the cycle pundits are operating without Wigington's data, and very soon the path of world affairs will likely diverge into a severe bifurcation.  This needs to be addressed at length.     

----------------------------------------------------
[1]
https://usawatchdog.com/provoking-nuclear-war-with-russia-dr-paul-craig-roberts/

[2]
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/geopolitical/kissinger-on-ukraine/

[3]
https://usawatchdog.com/third-of-global-population-killed-in-next-war-cycle-charles-nenner/

[4]
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/disease/the-disease-cycle-turns-up-april-2022/

Addendum - the comparison with the fall of Athens


  Note, in addendum to the last posting, these articles this morning from Armstrong [5], [6].  I have mentioned a while back the similarity between the current American hubris and Athens' war against Sparta that led to its downfall.  Armstrong adds valuable insights into the history.  The recklessness and technocratic arrogance of the current culture and Western global policies has departed from rational thinking, let alone spiritual conscience and prudence, or any of the attributes of our forefathers.  Forget for a moment the shocking level of mental degradation of our current President [7], that leaves one less than confident in a situation that could at any time degrade to major war.  

   Armstrong's code results have consistently indicated the shift of world socioeconomic power to China by 2032.  We are on schedule.  A question arises - can anything be done about it?  These socioeconomic cycles are surprisingly refractory, indicating an element of inescapable fate, but there is the role of free will and inspiration that are not so deterministic.  So far, however, the bulk of American people, indeed most of the West, are apparently sleeping livestock, passively chewing their cuds while these global proteges spin their webs.  Note in [2], the discussion of Trudeau's latest policy of removing vaccine restrictions for Ukrainian refugees in Canada, all the while every burden is levied on the Canadian people.  Yes, let us worry to death about Ukraine, a center of corruption, while we ruin ourselves in blind, comfortable consensus.  Of course, it is not the Ukranian people, but their government that is the culprit, in collusion with Geneva, but few notice this.  And, as mentioned before, despite Nenner's statement that the pandemic cycle is waning from the 2020 peak, we note Armstrong's result indicating that the real pandemic peak is associated with the vaccine.  We have yet to see if the Rockefeller Protocols will yield an even more horrible debut.  

   When we look deeper than the cyclic aspects, however, there are questions about how ecological collapse and accelerated weather manipulations will render their arrogant shipwreck, and what kind of world China will in fact be achieving their peak in, if not perhaps a theoretical one in which few remain.  Meanwhile, analysts see only the long term gradual trends, and not the serpent they are about to step on.  This nonlinear aspect of our immediate future is what even the best cycle analysts are not considering. let alone the podium pulpits of these doomed Great Reseters, and all their livestock.  Who even remains awake at this moment to discuss this, let alone arrest the process?  As it was for Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull, for those still free, all could come down to a good way to die.  Unlike that great culture that was in harmony with nature, indeed realty, for many centuries, we are our own authors of destruction, asleep at the wheel that we have let go of.  What epiphany will change woke to awakened, that is not the second suns seen by so many visionaries of the past, when viewing this time period?  Is this all that man is capable of? 


[5]
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/geopolitical/is-america-committing-the-sin-of-athens/

[6]
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/canada/canada-waives-vaccine-requirement-for-ukrainian-refugees/

[7]
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/humor/how-to-speak-bidenese/



17 May, 2022

Replacement of the Neutron Chain Reaction Paradigm

 
  This significant article by Armstrong this morning [1] brings into focus the architecture of our current geopolitical situation.  Of particular note is the thesis that the globe masters intend to bring the U.S. military effectively under U.N. control.  This is logical under the premise that the U.S. military, and U.S. in general, is already a de facto enforcement arm of the Western Old World merchant banker oligarchs.  It is worth reminding, in this context, the article posted by Hodges recently discussing Klaus Schwab's Rothschild pedigree, which makes matters somewhat self-explanatory.  The perspective deepens when we revisit Skousen's discussions in Strategic Relocation regarding the inducement of a limited nuclear conflict as part of a castration process of U.S. sovereignty, shifting ultimate military stewardship of world affairs on an emergency basis to U.N. jurisdiction.  Skousen cites the signing of PDD-60 in 1997, restraining our strategic nuclear response after an attack, as part of the overall plan to absorb the first attack.  Skousen then proposes the possibility that space based systems will be used to throttle the Russian and Chinese action.  Note also yesterday's Armstrong article, ending with the mention that the current agenda being played upon Russia will then turn to China.  There remain some speculative features to this situation, but the overall picture, especially in its counterintuitive dimension, contains unnerving alignments. 

   Also notable is the central role if the WHO, which is related to health crises,  This aligns with the Rockefeller Lockstep agenda concept, which includes as part of its final stages the introduction of a high mortality rate pathogen once the vaccine mandate process loses its bite. 

   The notion that this all can be solved by a November election is ludicrous, both from the perspective of actually achieving an honest election under current circumstances, as well as by the sheer mass of Western geopolitical lockstep, visibly, and frankly incredibly, being applied to drive Russia.  China is resisting much more subtly by pretending to lock down its ports and shipping for covid, thus delaying direct pretext for a commitment against the West, cleverly using the West's own medicine against it.  What is not addressed so commonly is the driving force behind all of these affairs - ecological infarction leading to global famine in a very short timeframe.       

   Preparing a homestead, canning jars and radios, will not be enough to deal with the coming reality.  Only Dane Wigington seems to address this in its full perspective, realizing that mass awakening and rapid overturning of the current global paradigm may hold in its balance what is left of any realistic proposition for human existence itself, let alone any stupid notions of maintaining current way of life for more than a few months now.  The elite have massive bunkers for a reason, never mind the ultimate prognosis for such facilities, but the alt media only holds back-patting and networking conferences that do little more than enhance profits and promote hobby prepping from the comfort of confirmation bias.  An entirely new economic system must be defined and formed as a material antithesis of Bitcoin, in which the currency is commodity equity, in the context of a refractory constitution for human affairs.  The U.S. Constitution has filled that role, but is being actively castrated by the globalist's as an impediment to their rehashing of socialism.  It did not work in Soviet Russia, and won't anywhere else.  Any residual of current populism must be converted to a movement in which the long term wisdom that founded the Constitution, and, for instance, the Magna Carta, is restored to the forefront of our thinking.......... and action.  Decentralized, organic agrarian socioeconomic structures, under a much broader ecumenical definition and art of study, are ultimately more efficient in terms of environment and freedom, and it was the conflict between such a culture and the Dutch-London banking industrial system that was cited in Kirsten's Memoirs with H. Himmler, as the seminal foundation of the first world war.  A similar dichotomy existed in Britain, exported to America in a geographical inversion, to become the conflict between the northern banking industrial culture and the southern agricultural culture.  As Winston Churchill wrote - the American Civil War was the most inevitable in history.  True, sustainable technological advancement must come as a mode of decentralized eco-harmonious culture, not as a vehicle to founder endlessly increasing population, and an industrial footprint that ultimately uses a planet up - which it has in fact done.  The entire paradigm of increasing the power of a religion or nation through persistent population rise and industrial capacity is dangerously obsolete, and in fact has been for some time.  Of course, before the American Civil War, we see an even larger conflict - the introduction of the European paradigm to the American Indian cultures that were in relative equilibrium with nature for hundreds of centuries.  That European paradigm destroyed the continent in an unsustainable bloom of existential materialism, and now the planet, in scarcely two, learning nothing about the consequences.    

   As Armstrong points out, the Schwab Great Reset is doomed to fail.  But the principal question is how much damage will be done before the paradigm runs its course.  Not just military and economic damage, but irrevocable ecological damage, never mind for a moment the suffering of a third world war, or else something worse - an Orwellian nightmare that totally dehumanizes those who are not yet dead from a poisoned planet.  It is time to consider these matters, or else simply pile the bodies in front of us, awaiting the incoming consequences of simply preparing on a personal level, as a divided people.  The false kings must be vanquished, along with their paradigm.  World war is still on schedule, for the middle of this decade, and there is no talk of peace, or of the precepts of humanity and sustainable civilization that bring peace.  That will require real, proactive leaders of humanity, who understand that in our lexicon of legitimate advancements, the neutron chain reaction must be replaced with a psychic one, that resonates with the naturally integrated foundations of human existence and inspirations - and not yet another stale, centralized socioeconomic paradigm based upon a refurbished ideology of pharaohs and slaves.


[1]
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/conspiracy/who-grand-play-for-world-power/

16 May, 2022

Regarding the Stupidity of the Western Agenda

  

    Note the yahoo article today indicating that NATO is making an "open ended" commitment to Ukraine.  Meanwhile, P.C. Roberts offers an excellent commentary [2] on the mentality of the Kremlin, in particular the compromising effect of the oligarchs who are tied to commerce with the West.  We also have a discussion by Armstrong regarding the shift away from neutrality by Switzerland [3].  This paragraph from Armstrong's discussion is definitive -

"....Indeed, we certainly have the worst possible crop of world leaders EVERYWHERE. There is not a single political decision that anyone can possibly even call reasonable. We even had the insanity of Boris Johnson threatening to strike Russia with nukes outside of NATO. Just one nuke from Russia will take out all of Great Britain. This pounding of chests is not going to do anything but hurl us toward war so they can do this Great Rest and default on world debt because they have run the largest Ponzi scheme in human history.
 
   Indeed, we are entering a phase of world affairs that are becoming an irrevocable commitment to total economic insolvency and then major war.  The normalcy bias of springtime in the American streets, perturbed as yet modestly by inflation and the initially subtle isotropic compression of the Lockstep Agenda, is a beguiling residual from our glory days of past dominance, in which we drew global reserves with relative impunity.  Very soon, all will not be so subtle, but also soon, it will be, in all practicality, too late to start the drastic changes in lifestyle and connections necessary to prepare for what is coming, if even the greatest efforts will be enough for most to survive at all.  There is a complementary perspective in which the prospect for nuclear escalation may seem imminent, but the current economic phase of WWIII has a significant time frame as did the previous world wars.  An exception is the danger of a mistake that will instantly send us into a nuclear confrontation ahead of the brinkmanship. The danger of this is greatly enhanced by the recklessness of the current Western agenda, and its purchased Judas Goat named Zelensky.  Nonetheless, Armstrong's code results indicate escalation into 2023, and major war more than a year after.  In any event, this is not a gainful prospect upon which to base one's future, and the stewardship is not remotely close to the quality of competence and integrity of the EXCOMM that barely made it through the gauntlet of the Cuban Missile Crisis. As Kennedy said, "If I make a mistake, two hundred million people will die."  Now, how many?      

  Armstrong's prior article discussing Sweden and Finland is noteworthy [4], as is this extract -

    "....I am putting together the full story covering both sides. We all have a right to know. NATO wants war and this is a war to exterminate Russia. Ukraine is the proxy war as our computer forecast back in 2013 that this would be the place where it all begins. The West could care less how many Ukrainians die – civilians or otherwise. Their purpose is to weaken Russia and only then will NATO act. Next will then be China."

   It is high time that peoples' discussions turn decisively to the matters of survival of the coming events, never mind for the moment what to do about a half a hundred Bilderberg Mussolini's in need of the guillotine treatment.  Canning jars and seeds, not Bitcoin, will be the currency of the realm, at least any halfway functional realm.  Of course, for the relatively few who understand to some extent the true agenda, there is. waiting behind it. the driving reality - ecological catastrophe on an incredibly short timescale, and the strategic preparations by various oligarchs such as Gates, who are purchasing control of our food production capacity and making moves to restrict that supply.  This is in addition to many other long term agendas, such as the 1974 classified document outlining the introduction of methods for population management and reducing fertility [5].   

  All but a few in American society, and in much of the world, will at this moment proffer every rationale to disregard these considerations, although I would venture to suggest that within a couple of years, none of them will be disregarding them.  But it will be too late for them to organize meaningful collectives to have control of primary resources when these resources have collapsed, let alone the actual atmospheric changes that will be rapid and merciless.  Then again, so will nuclear war, which will render an instant, unambiguous attitude adjustment.  Those who believe that Russia can be canceled by fact-checking and brinkmanship will discover, in a similar way to Hitler, what a mistake that proposition is, and most likely with a similar result.  The same neuvo-tech technocratic solipsism is also producing an environmental collapse, under the specious ironies of watered-down, quasi-stable climate change mantras, and their carbon credit holding companies.  All are grasping for coins on a sinking ship, as the lifeboat drifts away.  For now, we are facing a major engineered threat to our North American wheat belt, probably record Colorado wildfires and water shortages, all the while India and other major wheat [and food in general] production is degrading.  It is also no measurable coincidence that Union Pacific is executing agenda policy by refusing delivery of CF Industries fertilizer right at peak use.  We have ample precedent for diabolical blooms of global ambition, and the current one is in play, if only to swallow its own tail, and all who serve it, both deliberately and unwittingly.  But the greatest calm is just before the tornado, and the childish naivete of commonplace complacency will be, as always, swept up in the slaughter.

   It is best to remember that Mother Nature does not flavor stupidity.  The most unnerving consideration, however, is that world war is not the most urgent and lethal issue.

---------------------
[1]

[2]

[3]
[4]

[5]


14 May, 2022

   This article [1], published by G.E. Griffin and referenced by Dave Hodges, is quite a significant observation.  Not only is there a coordinated effort to restrict food production, but the connections between the heads of Roadblock, Schwab and the CFR, together with a demonstrable conspiratorial policy are evident.  This not being caused by Russia, not is it accidental.


[1]

4 May, 2022

Memo to Dane (Wiggington) regarding the latest Nebraska weather


Dane,

   Note this article on the Nebraska snow on Monday [1].  The article goes on to discuss the contrast to the previous week and a half, where temps were in the 70s and 90s, and uses the term weather whiplash  Of course, no mention of the real cause - increased Taylor instability of the climactic thermal hydraulics, due to artificial thermodynamic gradients.  This is, naturally, also the origin of the severe warm season weather events as well. 

   The real issue is not, per se, the article's ostensive implication of a historical norm that there can be a major snow in Nebraska, but the time and space gradients that are producing extraordinary fluctuations, due to chemical and electromagnetic driving of the atmosphere.  The article points out the much needed precipitation, but fails to address the damages caused by such shifts this late in the season, or the notable NOAA forecasts of refractory drought in much of the U.S. wheat belt for the entire growing season.
 
  I would suggest that the American public is largely so uninformed, or misinformed, to the extent that the remote tribes of Africa are more aware of the truth regarding what is happening to the planet.  As the enthalpy continues to accelerate, the instability should be expected to increase, and soon to the point that crops will not yield.  And then there is the ultraviolet spectral hardening, and its time frame of only several more years to develop a more fully lethal agricultural sterilizing effect.  This is ultimately what is driving global affairs, but secretly.

   There should be some people set up to take precipitation samples in such events to have them analyzed for the barium endothermic components, along with what else is being  applied in the atmospheric aerosol injections.  It is interesting that Skousen's last posting [2] indicates that the Kremlin will not appeal to a nuclear escalation for some time yet, not immediately as some suggest.  This is consistent with the SOCRATES results, indicating increased war cycle in 2023, and major war cycle in 2024 onward.  As the Ukraine conflict becomes chronic, the damage to the world economy will accumulate and interact with the climactic shifts.  The prospect for major food supply failure, and then general socioeconomic breakdown is huge, and increasing.  America worries to death about Roe v Wade and Johnny Depp's personal life, while the fox is raiding the hen house and the locusts are cleaning the field.

   The asinine lockstep of Western leaders is so complete and incomprehensible that one must appeal to a more sinister explanation.  At least Russia and China follow self-proclaimed despots, and this brings forth Lincoln's famous comment [3], which has more than anecdotal relevance today.  Now, we have a new batch of Know-Nothings for the 21st century and its upcoming war - the neocons, who pollute both parties in the interest of a nefarious, clandestine global agenda called a "Reset"...........    

***
        "I am not a Know-Nothing. That is certain. How could I be? How can any one who abhors the oppression of negroes, be in favor of degrading classes of white people? Our progress in degeneracy appears to me to be pretty rapid. As a nation, we begin by declaring that "all men are created equal." We now practically read it "all men are created equal, except negroes." When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read "all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and catholics." When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty-to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy."


[1]
https://www.accuweather.com/en/winter-weather/snow-makes-nebraska-look-like-middle-of-winter-in-may/1181510

[2]
https://joelskousen.com/

[3]
https://www.nps.gov/liho/learn/historyculture/knownothingparty.htm


2 May, 2022

The Course of the Agenda


  The covid meme continues as we see indications of acceleration of the agenda - as we go into summer, not winter.  Griffin notes that Fauci has retracted his prior statements [1], ans we see that China's covid policies extend far beyond what is necessary to address the actual covid issue [2].  As discussed in prior entries, there is evidence that China's covid polices are for social control.  But this is arguably the entire paradigm on the global level.  It is interesting that Russia and China have been resisting the Great Reset agenda, yet we see this draconian lockdown in Shanghai , etc.   The supply chain problems are no accident, and there is a perspective regarding Shanghai in which the true objective is to exacerbate the crisis.  The Chinese lockdowns appear to be a matter of social control typical of the Chinese government, combined with an objective to aggravate the Western economic disruption.  The international cooperation in geoengineering appears to be continuing, and is on a different level, but it would be reasonable to assume that this will break down at some point, once the global economic bifurcation becomes more pronounced.  Ostensibly, it does not make sense that China would be throttling their economic picture by effectively closing the Shanghai [and other] ports, but this may be part of a preparation for something more dramatic. 

   In another article, Armstrong makes strong points regarding the Agenda 2030 dimension of the current economic and war itinerary [3].  We are falling deeper into a world war paradigm.  Generally, most people either take a revelatory view of an inevitable WWIII, or they are entrenched in the comfort of normalcy bias, enhanced by Western comforts, shielded under comparatively moderate inflation so far, and by a sense of security that is quickly becoming an overestimate of Western military capability.  It bears repeating here again, that Armstrong's comments regarding the role of the U.N. under the prospect of general war are identical to Skousen's thesis in Strategic Relocation [4].

   Armstrong also notably points out [3] that during the next ten years [leading into the pivotal timeframe of 2032 in which China will come to dominate world economics], the United States will divide.   The SOCRATES code results have been consistent regarding this shift in power.  Unless there is monumental and immediate overturning within Western leadership, we will be living through, or perhaps not living through, an unprecedented global catastrophe.  In particular, if the American fall elections do not comprehensively clean house, then there becomes a strong argument to proactively initiate a split, based rather ironically upon the preservation of the Union, or what is in reality what is left of it.  Under the current heading food shortage, then famine and war, are on our horizon, both in the purview of the insanity of our so-called leaders, and by the institutionalised incompetence and arrogance of our unsustainable ecological usury.  The worst of this specter can still be averted, but not using a television set and a bag of pretzels.  Make no mistake about it, war and massive destruction are on the agenda, unless and until those who are peddling this false economy and false environmentalism, ultimately creating a far worse disaster in both, are given the Mussolini treatment.  Armstrong's code does indicate that indeed these "world leaders" will indeed fail, but the question remains whether this will occur before or after they sink the ship - that depends upon us.  

[1]
https://needtoknow.news/2022/05/fauci-walks-back-coronavirus-comments-says-pandemic-not-over/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=fauci-walks-back-coronavirus-comments-says-pandemic-not-over
[2]
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/china/chinas-extreme-lockdown-measures/
[3]
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/we-have-enemies-within-our-own-governments-seeking-war/
[4]
Joel Skousen, "Strategic Relocation," rd ed. 2010.