25 July, 2022
Development of the Ecological
E.L.E.
The latest global
alert session with Dane [1] contains an
announcement regarding recent data on the
status of oceanic plankton. For
several years, Dane has reported an
approximately seventy percent loss of
oceanic plankton relative to the mid
twentieth century, along with other
indications of accelerating ocean
morbidity. The recent study [from
Edinburgh, as I recall] indicates a ninety
percent plankton loss in Atlantic
plankton, with a prognosis of collapse of
the oceanic biosphere on the order of
several years. This is also in
keeping with the ongoing solar radiometric
measurements showing a hardening of the
ultraviolet spectrum into the UVC and
x-ray ranges, with increasing precision
for the time=frame
in which the sterilizing effect will
overcome biologic capacity to accommodate
the radiation burden - notably including
the loss of crop growing capacity, along
with general loss of solvency of the
biosphere, by about 2025.
This information
is now unambiguously within the scope of
an extinction level event, with a time frame on the
order of only several years. In
contrast to the traditional notion of an
E.L.E. in which the defining event is a
sharp discontinuity such as an asteroid
strike, the current situation is a
differentiable [i.e. smooth] set of
physical functions that are more subtly
approaching critical bifurcations within
the strange attractors that govern the
many feedback mechanisms of the biosphere
and geophysical-astrophysical
relationships. As such, the series
of point-of-no-return conditions are
masked by the stochastic nature of the
ecology, allowing a deceptive momentum of
perturbed normalcy to sustain "normalcy
bias," and practical indifference among
the general populace. Some points of
no return have already passed, but given
the current advanced state of depletion of
plankton, the chain of life ultimately
connected with it, and further indications
of accelerated planetary thermodynamic
instability, all precedents of
socioeconomic norms, as well as
geopolitical developments, will quickly be
overshadowed by the developments of the
E.L.E.
It is
encouraging to finally see an
acknowledgement of Dane's work on
Armstrong's site [2]. As I have
discussed on numerous occasions, the
cyclic benchmarks of SOCRATES would
benefit by an alternative introduction of
a boundary condition related to the
geophysical discontinuity of the E.L.E.
shock front. If the ecological
indications continue to confirm the
E.L.E., then the waves describing a
transition of power from the West to China
in the 2030's will likely be preempted by
total sociopolitical collapse, and
vestigial residuals of world order and
commerce, if they even will exist at
all. More substantial analysis of
this process is critical. Planetary
ecological resilience is always an
argument, but at best any transition will
be a violent re-calibration
of our existence, and will reset the
algorithms. Like the phenomenon of
quantum tunneling, the wave functions
restricted by a potential well [or a
one-sided boundary on a temporal axis],
will generally decompose to exponential
expressions - in this case the decay of
the socioeconomic waves, until a new
equilibrium strange attractor basis for
our biosphere is established. The
expectation is a hugely volatile
transition, and the range of new states
includes those in which life cannot exist
for a very long time. In 2018 I
brought forth the proposition of the
"nuclear winter" discontinuity as a
possible philosophy to force a point of no
return for the "Venus syndrome" condition
as suggested by the Kennett study [see
Clathrate Gun hypothesis]. The logic
was that survival of a fraction of mankind
and biosphere from a marginally produced
nuclear winter effect would be preferable
to total and permanent annihilation from a
lethal planetary thermal spike.
Behind this logic, however, was the
implicit doubt that such a program would
be sufficiently accurate to be reliable,
and more importantly, that the only
truly viable solution is to cease and
desist all geo-engineering
and climate weaponization
immediately, as Dane has insisted upon all
along. Best to face the music
now. The nuclear winter scenario
therefore arguably falls into the pattern
of typical allopathic solutions that the
modern world employs, which is arguably
now futile and condemned with lethal side
effects as are its medicines. The
recent discussions of the nuclear winter
remedy, and certainly the preposterous
patent employing nuclear explosives for
weather control [see announcements by
Wigington, ca July 9 or 16], seem to fall
quite predictably upon the table.
The geopolitical
equation continues to maintain control on
general populaces based upon traditional
psychological operations, and upon
obfuscations such as the "climate change"
meme, while the informed few prepare their
redoubts and convert equities ahead of an
unprecedented avalanche. Even the
interest rate maneuvers by the Fed are
suspiciously positioned to exhaust and
ultimately starve emerging nations through
exacerbation of their debt, but also to
include the bulk of Europe and ultimately
America, as they are necessarily
expendable under current eugenics.
Prostration of food facilities, fertilizer
and pressure dome drought are consistent
with this perspective. Ironically,
the removal of Russia from SWIFT was
probably the greatest favor the West could
ever proffer to Russia, as it is now
actively engaged in the business of
self-reliance and civil defense.
Russia will end up with the gas and also
Ukrainian grain, if all comes to war,
which China will be more than happy to
trade for. The same advise of self
reliance applies to every individual and
tribal group, with the cosmopolitan
exception that there is an urgent need for
a new kind of leadership of humanity that
can salvage what is left of our ability to
act conscientiously and genuinely in novel
harmony with -
a]
Each other, and
b]
Nature
------------------------------------
[1]
[2]
3 July, 2022
The Coming
Fire
Hunter's interview with Armstrong on 2 July 2022 [1]
covers the essential factors and timeline for economic
shifts, civil unrest and world conflict. The time
frame for major world war and nuclear conflict remains on
the SOCRATES charts as peaking 2024 onward, with
accelerating civil unrest in America and the world in
general in 2023. One important indicator will be the
mechanics of the November U.S. elections. In
particular, Armstrong expressed the concern that Biden
will be handed an order to issue a presidential edict to
generally legalize immigrant voting just before the
election, and on too short a notice for any practical
sanction to be executed against it. This would
likely ignite a refractory period of civil unrest,
possibly leading to civil war. In the same vein, the
breakup of the Eurozone and the U.S. will become much more
likely during this period [2023]. Considerable
investment is being made to sabotage the Trump/populist
sociological momentum through the standard mechanics of
dirty politics and yellow journalism. These
traditional methods will continue to work to some extent
until organic changes in our socioeconomic reality reach
breakpoints, principally defined by sufficiently high
energy and food prices, and the resulting infarction of
general economic conditions.
Armstrong's models show continuity through the late
2030's onward, although a significant reduction in world
population through that period. Given that these
predictions are based upon the cyclic factors, it is
necessary to add the ecological components that indicate
severe consequences in the mid 2020's, also coincident
with the timeline for general world war. As
discussed previously, this is where I believe that the
SOCRATES model will either bifurcate or become
unreliable. More development of the
ecological data is very important in order to estimate
this effect. Nuclear war, even limited, and
ultraviolet and thermal instabilities will easily
cripple the majority of global food production, along
with downward pressure already being seen with
fertilizer shortages. Breakdown and famine will
then quickly follow. The Skousen hypothesis has
indicated for more than a decade that there exists a
global strategy to induce a limited nuclear attack on
America by Russia and China as part of an ultimate move
by the supranational power structure to utilize U.N.
authority to establish a new global order, presumably
with the employment of the coercion of advanced weapons
and a notion of socioeconomic authority.
Armstrong's analysis is uncomfortably consistent with
such a philosophy, as the London/Brussels/Washington
complex is pushing policies precisely in line with such
an ultimate result. Where the Armstrong
perspective differs is that the complex is not so much
necessarily backed by advanced weapons and custodial
capacity as much as it is driven by delusions of regime
change to be forced upon Russia [and ultimately China]
based apparently upon the success of such covert
processes in smaller nations, and also through the use
of weather westernization. Given that the state of
geo-engineering is now clearly a disaster at the root of
the ecological infarction, requiring the introduction of
a major perturbation to the climactic strange attractor
[2], it is difficult to have material confidence in the
strategy of this power structure as an intervening
intellectual advancement that can justify the utterly
insane etiology, never mind morality, of its current
path. The prospect that geo-engineering is to be
directly used for planetary aerosol-based genocide [see
polymers, graphene carrying agents,] ultimately far more
effective than the current Lockstep vaccine program, or
to produce a nuclear winter effect to arrest the
Clathrate Gun, remains debatable, but certainly are
increasingly indicated, both technically and from the
perspective that global power is approaching a crescendo
of desperation and insanity, for which there are ample
precedents, except perhaps for the new totality of
effects . .
The general resiliency of mankind's affairs have
traditionally provided surprising recovery from major
world events, most notably the second world war, but
these are, in the final analysis, based upon substantial
borrowing from natural resources by Western economies at
the expense of the emerging nation, and from the planet
itself. In one perspective, the Great Reset is a
demolition of the Western standard of living, but
completely unrealistic on essentially every principle of
socioeconomic fundamentals, as well as common
sense. The Reset is arguably an ivory tower
illusion similar to the impracticable idealism of
Marxism, and certainly the concept of destroying Russia,
as is being expressed in London, is not only
impractical, but is likely to unleash a prophetic
catastrophe..
Ten dollar gasoline in America is highly likely
according to Armstrong, although there is discussion in
Washington to delay the rise until after the election
[Armstrong]. Fuel is already this expensive in
Europe, but it is also worth noting that Europe's
transportation system and culture is far more dense and
well developed than in America, and a similar price
range here would be economically devastating, on top of
already morbid trends Dividing one's equities and
income by two, three or four will become a necessary
exercise for any realistic purview of one's affairs from
next year onward, never mind the effects of
unprecedented civil violence, supply chain collapse and
then the glide path to nuclear conflict and global
ecological realities.
Even local commodity production and autonomy and
off-grid capability just scrape the surface of
conditions that will prevent supply of maintenance and
other critical commodities, never mind the difficulties
of growing food and maintaining a physical environment
as planetary conditions become clearly more hostile to
most species of animals and plants. In contrast to
Armstrong's population reduction figures in the late
thirties, we can recall Nenner's results indicating a
one third reduction in global population due to major
war - a full decade sooner. We also have Celente's
long standing mantra - "when all else fails, they take
us to war."
I believe, as expressed before, that even the best
existing socioeconomic wave models are subject to
discontinuities as the geophysical factors amplify the
nonlinear dynamics of global food production and the
current geopolitical developments. Even under the
best of prognoses, only those who have successfully
developed remote cooperatives and homesteads stand a
chance for any notion of quality of life, and this must
be weighed against the ecological data as it becomes
more definitive. So far, however, there is to my
knowledge no integrated analysis of this full spectrum
of considerations in the alternative press and its
technical resources. There remains, though, an
increasingly clear set of reasons why the elite have
built elaborate underground redoubts, and quite
obviously their integrated information is proprietary,
and not for consumption by the masses of "useless
eaters." Without an epic rise of enlightened
leadership on a global scale, virulently departing from
the current geopolitical power structures and their
belief systems, there is a strong argument that only the
remoteness and resourcefulness of Qumran will offer any
prospect of a meaningful survival, if indeed survival
itself remains feasible. Unfortunately, human
nature and affairs is defined principally by Pompeian
events, in which the vast majority, and its comfortable
consensus of complacency, become ossified by high
heat.
Do we intend to continue neglecting the potential of
inspiration and free will, and allow human nature to
face the coming epic fire so rigid and fated?
-----------------------
[1]
[2]
It
is worth noting that the current Stratospheric Aerosol
Injection process suffers from the effect of long
term warming of the biosphere, despite temporary
reflective increase of solar isolation albedo, but there
is evidence that sudden large scale introduction of a
large inventory of particulates will produce a
precipitous effect of massive cooling, without the
feedback effect of infrared trapping seen with the
current applications. This is the basis of the
nuclear winter effect, first considered in the
1970's. [see the documentary, "On The Eight
Day." Only a very small percentage of current
nuclear arsenals can produce the effect, and arguably
within a range of residual fallout background radiation
that is in principle survivable.]