Thelibertyman.com
12.17.24
Hello All -
Recent discussions regarding cancer therapy via ivermectin and other repurposed compounds leads to several intriguing parallels found in other methodologies, including H. Clark's approach involving the elimination of the life stages of the human intestinal fluke [HIF] in combination with detoxification [1]. It is notable, however, that distinctions are made between the direct relevance of parasitic involvement in carcinogenic processes, and indirect effects. An example of this consideration is the FLCCC discussion [2, p.93]
"Although a number of antiparasitic drugs including ivermectin, mebendazole and niclosamide have proven anti-cancer effects it is important to recognize that cancer is NOT a parasitic disease as has been suggested in the “popular press” and by misguided clinicians. There is no evidence that cancer is caused by or related to any parasitic disease. These drugs act via specific biochemical pathways specific to the cancer cell which are distinct from their anti-parasitic
mechanisms of action."
........At this point, the biochemical arguments become intensely complex and specific, but I believe that it is important to point out that beyond the necessity for scientific discipline in such regards, there is a significant problem of not seeing the forest for the trees. This problem exists in urgent terms ranging from present international nuclear and war doctrines to the polarised intransigence regarding planetary ecological status. Schools of even the hard sciences can and do become incestuous and overwrought as the ancient Roman law books, failing not from the effort of analytical discipline, but rather from the vulnerability of high complexity that fails to see beyond its unintended intellectual polycystitis. So will come the ultimate failure of so-called "AI," as we remember HAL9000, "I'm sorry Dave," and those who play God with the world fail to understand the first element in the comprehension of consiousness, let alone the powers that created our world.....
Continuing....The quote above from the FLCCC would seem at face value to contradict Clark's thesis that the HIF, allowed to complete all six stages of propagation in the human host due to the presence of certain organic chemicals, releases a compound that inhibits the body's natural regulation method of regulating carcinomas, and her cited extremely high efficacy of method. It also appears to contradict the observations regarding use of fenbendazole, and also, Mebendazole and Albendazole [3], [5] as antiparasitics, but nonetheless recognises certain specific biochemical anti-cancer efficacies with these compounds.
It would seem very reasonable to consider that there are not only a number of specific biochemical pathways as discussed by [2], but also a generality occurring with parasitic therapy - possibly tied in common with the HIF, the cited, as well as other pathways such as suppression of trypsin. The Clark method includes a rather thorough detoxification process, both environmentally as well as internally [intestinal, kidney and liver cleanses, and careful attention paid to environmental-household toxin loads], which could suggest an ambiguity.
It is interesting, however, that even in the case of the FLCCC discussions, that introduction of autophagic inhibitors negates the efficacy of the ivermectin anticarcinomic effects. The trypsin route is considered in parallel to dietary intake of a significant class of anticancer agents related to amygdalin [vitamin B-17], and the discussions of Griffin et al [4]. Griffin cites not only significant efficacy far above standard chemotherapeutic methods, but a very specific biochemical vector associated with the amygdalin molecule. This vector is characterised by a unique enzyme in trophoblast cells that metabolises amygdalin into its toxic residuals, in particular benzene and cyanide components, that become synergistically toxic within the trophoblast cells, rapidly killing them. This action has apparently been observed with high efficacy even in advanced cases, but notably also includes regimens of clean environment and diet. The environment and diet alone do not generally show such high efficacy rates, certainly with advanced cases. This last observation emeliorates the adjunct ambiguities in Clark's method mentioned above.
Another consideration is the use of stem cell potentiation as part of other therapies, such as copper peptide enhancement including GHK-Cu, et al [6]. Given that the parasitic etiologies discussed above are completely independent of the trypsin and trophoblast stem cell avenues, the augmentation routes associated with regulating and in particular suppressing the stem cell growth in normal tissue repair processes do point toward a possible concern associated with over-stimulation of stem cell processes. One specific area of concern is the need to limit copper in relation to cancer cell propagation, as copper is especially high in cancer cells [7]. It therefore does not appear incidental that the copper peptide stimulates both stem cell growth as a regeneration effect, as well as a potentiation of carcinogenesis, requiring consideration of a mediating regimen to achieve homeostasis.
Hypothetically, therefore, there seems to be merit in the consideration that any "fountain of youth" effects via copper peptides and other stem cell enhancements will carry with them a distinct potential for increased cancer risk, and that there also may exist a complementary therapy that might inhibit or regulate that risk. An attractive avenue for such a regulating element is, of course, amygdalin, recognising that there may be a therapeutic push-pull effect involved, such as using one therapy for a period, and then the other, either at a daily frequency or possibly on a monthly basis. Dosing protocols for GHK-Cu [see, for instance, 6] do indicate modulation and limitation of dosing. Certain methods designed to enhance copper peptide therapies, regardless of their method, must be considered in light of these issues related to the balance of tissue repair and cancer.
Given that the six week fetus brings the pancreas online with a trypsin purge of stem cells, followed by transition to a balanced relationship between tissue repair and limitation of stem cell growth, there is a basis for cancer to be regarded as an imbalance in one or more factors in stem cell etiology. Concerns apply, for instance, various apparatus to enhance copper peptide concentrations in the body as a function of carcinogenic potentiation. This includes, for instance, the direct stimulation and application of copper peptides [8].
Clearly much more research is due in these areas of consideration, and one must be wary of any therapy that combines, for instance, a vague or notional phototherapeutic concept with an indeterminate transdermal application, especially where cancer potential is involved. There is, however, an intriguing potential for the modulation of GHK-Cu, et al, with amygdalin or even trypsin, to produce a stable beneficial balance between enhanced tissue repair and carcinogenesis. In addition, adjuncts to the above therapies involving detoxification, may be relevant. Extended fasting [long enough to produce significant autophagy], combined with environmental and dietary cleansing found helpful in cancer therapy, may produce a multiplying [synergistic] effect that is measurable, if not considerable. Interactions with medicines is, of course, largely unknown.
It is also likely that applications of GHK-Cu in specific milligram regimens [6], along with the above considerations, can produce significant results at a fraction of the cost of various methods that may mask the essential ingredients behind new age gimmicks and other memes. In any case, there are arguable risks also based upon all of the above considerations as well as other unknowns. With such a multitude of health hacks in the deluge of infomercials, as well as membership pyramids with huge profit margins, one must be equally wary under the philosophy of caveat emptor. So often the resolution of a problem, even if caught in a circuitous mire, is ultimately a specific, simple and inexpensive vector to homeostasis, with some degree of inescapable debt to entropy.
------------------------
[1]
Hulda R. Clark, "The Cure for All Cancers," New Century Press, 1993.
[2]
https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Cancer-Care-FLCCC-Dr-Paul-Marik-v2.pdf
[3]
[4]
G.E.Griffin, World Without Cancer,
[5]
[6]
https://pathofpeds.com/gkh-cu/
[7]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10327296/
[8]
US 10,716,953 Bl
Jul. 21, 2020
ABSTRACT
Embodiments enables a wearable phototherapy apparatus
that produces beneficial effects to a human body such as
activation of stem cells, improvement in strength, improve-
ment in stamina, pain relief via a non-transdermal container.
May include an optional transdermal container that releases
or increases copper peptide GHK-Cu in a subject's body.
The non-transdermal apparatus reflects or emits specific
wavelengths of light to elevate levels of the copper peptide
GHK-Cu in the body. The non-transdermal apparatus
includes one or more materials that prevent the Left-Handed
molecule from direct contact with the body while the
enclosure is coupled to the body and prevents the Left-
Handed molecules from entering the body.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The recent interview of Lavrov by Carlson [1] is well worth listening to. Interesting that he indicates that, despite having no meaningful correspondences with his American counterparts for quite a long time, Russia is nonetheless in control of the theatre and well aware of the efforts by the current administration to escalate and complicate the Ukraine situation and to sabotage the relationship between the two countries ahead of the inauguration.
Given the degree of organized crime and money laundering networked through Ukraine, as well as Biden and considerable other politicians' involvement in that activity, one is essentially forced to conclude that an extraordinary orgy of extortion and syndicated obligation is in play, and it it that which is, and for some time has been driving the executive dimension of our foreign policy. Never mind, for a moment, the definitions of treason, but Russia, which has its own contingent of organized crime, who in fact became a part of the effort to compromise Russia through regime change and underhanded deals with Western business interests, is not naive regarding the real objectives of those controlling Western policy. Much as was with the Cuban Missile Crisis, there is currently an inextricable relationship between organized crime and national affairs, which are now on a fully global scale in which the target of profit is Russian natural resources. This carries an ironic, but precisely calculated twist relative to the green world order meme being used to throttle the various populations who are secretly expendable as war fodder in the ultimate equation.
To the question of who is in control in Washington, Lavrov shrugged the question as an unknown, although this is surely a strategic diplomatic understatement of his true understanding. The truly unknown residual of Lavrov's statement is nonetheless very destabilizing, and intensifies the importance of an assertive posture of meaningful cooperation by Trump. Interesting it is as well that Lavrov was reserved regarding his relationship with Trump, most likely a careful deflection of what could be distorted as a collusion. Lavrov is also reserved regarding the question of America and Russia "being at war," deferring to the more abstract dimension of asymmetric warfare, but acknowledges the very dangerous situation caused by rhetoric and a belief system on the part of the West that limited nuclear war is a practical option, and also that America is more or less immune to the consequences of escalation. Recent DEFCON regional status spread also indicated this same view, with North American nuclear DEFCON at level 4, general DEFCON at level 3, and European levels of 2 relative to missile status. It appears that the Russian approach is indeed a carefully subdued and calculated response strategy to Western increments of escalation, with the ultimate expectation that we will make it to the inauguration.
What is particularly unstable in the picture is the question of a bolt of blue performed surreptitiously by high level neoconservative factions through their dark global channels to force a response from Russia that departs qualitatively from the conventional chess board. This process has six weeks, although there are other possibilities that could enter the game later. What is at stake is the old world neoconservative network whose socioeconomic cycles are inescapably declining towards the East, and who may attempt to execute their own sequel of scorched earth doctrine. The SOCRATES results show refractory failure of these elements, but no indication is given as to their etiology, except that global conflict and war cycles also peak simultaneously. Breaking such cycles would require extraordinary intervention of visionary leadership - which is not currently on the horizon. The danger is a decline into deeper conflict and then a standard condensation towards a singular redemption that historically indicates an antichrist figure whose power is drawn from the more base reflexes of human behaviour. This sort of cycle, for which we have two primary precedents, is also well anticipated both intuitively as well as scripturally, but is also a dangerous potential arising from self-fulfilled prophesy, and a final brutal irony relative to the ultimate meaning of the spiritual codex - man can change.
--------------------
[1]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmgDf6QiCps
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello All -
Greg Hunter interviewed Armstrong today, with some valuable information, as usual. Beyond the politics is the matter of international affairs, in particular the Ukraine situation, to which Armstrong is quoted -
"When asked if we are still going to war with Russia, Armstrong said, “I hate to say this, but yes, and the (Socrates) computer is never wrong.” Armstrong fears dirty tricks, such as a false flag in Europe, that could get it going and blame the Russians for something they did not do. They want to do this before Trump takes office. Armstong says is still recommending a big food supply, gold and cash. He is also predicting that government wants to do away with paper money and do all digital so they can track everything. Will this work? Armstrong says no but they are going to try anyway."
From our perspective among the peanut hulls, the whole situation is very fluid, with at least ostensible campaign platform basis for an expedited development of a diplomatic solution, not to mention the patently sensible approach. But there are cross currents in the works, which, when combined with the code results, are frankly unnerving. One must assume that Armstrong's global staff would have a substantial indication of matters developing toward a settlement in Europe, if they indeed are, but this is apparently not yet indicated. If one consults Ritter or Macgregor, or for that matter the sentiments of Lavrov in his recent interview with Carlson, any move by the West to assertively dictate terms in Ukraine will be met with the reality that Russia has full control of the theatre and is well past the point of negotiation under pander of trust and compromise. The endemic pride of politicians is incompatible with the necessary humility of the current situation, and it may well goeth before the fall. The only useful redemption will be that the gross financial infarction underway will be more easily hidden, and blamed upon, a war that will be large enough to overshadow it. Useful for some, that is, until a little dog pulls the curtain.
It is also conspicuously notable that Armstrong again mentions the avenue of false flag to induce escalation during this interim period. How precisely is such a thing accomplished without testing the boundaries of limited nuclear exchange? Let's forget for the moment that the entire conflict is a pathetic cousin of "unnecessary," before we address this lemming race of Western heads of state abandoning all reason to patronise an epic construct of organised crime.